Gadi Shamia's Office 2.0 Blog

3 Posts tagged with the ingres tag

Yesterday, I moderated a panel titled “Going 100% SaaS” during the Office 2.0 Conference. There is a full video, so if you have 40 minutes to spare, you can see it all. It was also covered in Ben Kepes' blog. The panelists were 3 SaaS vendors (Dan Druker from Intacct, Rob Holl from Adaptive Planning, and Jeff Schultz from Bill.com), and one near 100% SaaS customer, Doug Harr from Ingres. Although we didn’t get to talk much about the future of SaaS, several interesting takeaways came out of the event:

 

  • 100% SaaS is real — Companies like Ingres made strategic decisions to become 100% SaaS, and they move programmatically toward that. If it was not for Exchange and Office, Ingres would be 100% in the cloud.
  • Going more SaaS has many cost advantages — First, it costs less than buying licenses. Doug compared his $140K/year investment in SFDC to $1.5M he spent on Siebel licenses only at his previous company. Second, it allows companies to flex costs based on the economic situation and to avoid shelfware.
  • SMB and technology companies first — It sounds like the first to adopt SaaS are young companies, technology companies, and SMBs. There are many department-driven sales as well.
  • The CIO needs to become a real business partner — both before the session and during the session we got to speak a lot about the changing role of the CIO. Now, when departments can make software decisions and the issues of deployment are removed, the CIO needs to become a business partner and help the business units to make product decisions and help integrate the relevant pieces to the overall business process. CIOs that will protect their turf and will try to control everything will find themselves out of the strategic decision loop.
  • SaaS empowers SMBs — SaaS allows small and mid size businesses to benefit from features that were once used only by large enterprises. With little implementation and monthly per user price point, everyone can get the best e-signature solution, or start managing projects more effectively. TakeEchoSign for example, British Telecom (BT) is using exactly the same tool to get 1,000s of sales contract signed a day as a limo service provider renting 3-4 limos a day, and they both realized the same exact benefit: getting agreements signed in an hour instead of a week.
  • Security — I was sure no one would ask the question, but it was asked… all vendors said that with SAS 70 and self-imposed standards, SaaS provides better security than a server you maintain in house. Intacct, for example, is hosted in an IBM data center guarded by armed guards and using retina scan for identification — very few customers will go that far to protect their data… Jeff mentioned that a security glitch for a normal company can be unpleasant, but for a SaaS company it can be a death sentence — something that motivates SaaS companies to be very carful.
As Ben noted, we didn’t get to speak much about the future of SaaS. The audience had enough questions about SaaS today that we were stuck in the present. If there is anything telling about this fact, it is that SaaS still has a long way to go before it is measured feature vs. feature, application vs. application when enterprises are shopping for new capabilities.
Cross published on a la 360.
9 Comments 0 References Permalink

Office 2.0 is just around the corner, and I am preparing for my session (going 100% SaaS) by interacting with my panelists, and doing some thinking. My current thread is thinking about IT and its traditional role vs. its new role in the SaaS era. There were ups and downs in the way IT viewed SaaS and now it seems that IT professionals divide into two camps: the ones that strongly embrace SaaS, and the ones that wait for it to go away.

 

In general, the ones that want it to go away like control, like hands on approach, and rather do the tactical work as a way to keep their kingdom intact. If you work for a startup, you may not believe me, but in a big company your worth goes up with the number of people you manage, and you don't want to lose anyone you gained.

 

The ones who love SaaS understand that it is here to stay and while not perfect, it allows significant time saving since somebody else is doing the mundane work for you. There are people that get paid to perform upgrades for you, take care of security, make sure the servers are up and that response time is great. The SaaS providers are more  efficient since one operations team is responsible for many thousands of users.

 

People need to realize that the only role of technology advancements is to save time and have intelligent people decide what to do with this extra time. All productivity enhancements happened exactly this way. With all the extra time that can be saved, IT can become more strategic to the organization (and have much more interesting jobs...), and focus on improving tools and services, talk with their internal clients, and find ways to make their lives better, and stop worrying about up time and power outages.

 

Not every organization can go 100% SaaS yet, and even for the ones that can there are many challenges in integration, many different parts that need to be glued together, and multiple ISVs to work with. But if SaaS is right for your organization, find a way for IT to participate and use wisely all the extra time they will have.

 

Doug Harr, CIO at Ingres, will represent this point of view in the going 100% SaaS session.

 

Gadi Shamia

4 Comments 0 References Permalink

I was invited by my friend Ismael Ghalimi to host a panel during Office 2.0 about my favorite topic, SaaS. The session is about going 100% SaaS and what it means. My panelists are Dan Druker from Intacct, Doug Harr from Ingres, Rob Hull from Adaptive Planning, and Rene Lacerte from Bill.com. What’s great about this team is that they are all senior executives that pioneered SaaS either with their current company, or in previous lives: Dan was part of Postini (later sold to Google), Rene co-founded PayCycle, one of the best kept SaaS success secrets in the valley, Rob co-founded Adaptive Planning in 2003, when no one believed SaaS would ever happen, and Doug spent 5 years with Portal Software, that was acquired by Oracle. We would not be lacking perspective here…

 

In the next couple of weeks I will share my thoughts about the 100% SaaS goal as I progress in preparing for it. For now I wanted to go back to the title, and explain the interesting story behind Office 2.0 and its connection to the Burning Man festival. Every year toward the end of the summer, a city is built in the Nevada desert. The city is built by a small number of people and then for a week host some 30,000 visitors from all over the world that come to celebrate freedom, community and art. By the end of that week the city will vanish with no trails. The Valley was always a great feeder for the event (Google founders placed an “out of office” doodle on Google homepage when they left for Burning Man in 1998). Burning Man organizers only put the infrastructure in place and the visitors bring the rest (decorations, art, food, elements for trading and everything else needed to make Burning Man what it is.

 

Office 2.0 is about the same: Ismael and a small team of friends help to put it all together as a community event that is heavily relying on technology to automate mundane tasks, and people to generate content that other people will enjoy to listen to and learn from. The whole project starts and ends in 2 months or so and leave only electronic trails… Ismael is only the facilitator, and we, speakers, sponsors and audience are on our own, trying to make it a great event.

 

These two events even happen at the same time: Burning Man ends a couple of days before Office 2.0 starts, and they are both great examples for events that empower the community to create value with minimal facilitation. Isn’t it so much more fun to participate in those kind of events rather than going to yet another PR driven, marketing funded event?

 

Posted on my personal blog

19 Comments 0 References Permalink