Paperless Office 2.0?

Posted by Francois Ragnet Aug 21, 2008

What about paper in all that? Is paper totally out of the equation in Office / Document 2.0? Will Office 2.0 finally deliver the “Paperless Office” promise?

 

Well, not quite yet… The paperless office became a buzzword after being introduced in an article, “The Office of the Future,” in Business Week in 1975. It coincided with the advent of the personal computer, and the hope was that all documents could be processed electronically and that paper would become irrelevant.

 

But has paper disappeared? Not quite yet. Actually, paper consumption is still increasing globally, soaring to extremely high levels. Some estimates go as high as 10-50 trillion pages! If we could stack up all printed pages, one year’s worldwide “production” could take us between 5 and 15 times to the moon depending on the estimate…

 

The good news is, paper consumption is now (somewhat) under control – moderate growth (around 2-3%), even declining in some countries. Still, we can get much greener. Did you know that between 20 and 40% of pages printed are discarded in the next 24 hours? That calls for new technologies such as electronic paper or transient paper, but also (and even more so) good practices… That’s what I call the “Less Paper Office”.

3 Comments 0 References Permalink

The Digital Universe

Posted by Francois Ragnet Aug 18, 2008

Even though the Paper Universe is (somewhat) under control, what about a Digital Document / Office 2.0 Universe in full expansion? Recent estimates are staggering: the Web Universe is made of over a trillion pages. And that’s nothing compared to the overall Digital Universe a few hundred exabytes, and growing at an incredible pace!How can we make sense of all that data? Isn’t finding a needle in the haystack a piece of cake compared to that? How can we put the Digital Universe under control, and the cloud under control? Although not as direct, this does have some impact on the environment, too…

3 Comments 0 References Permalink

In the future, the document will be aware of its environment. Not any more a single, closed container, it will gradually become a "mashup" pulling information from here and there. It will be able to self-update, self-validate… or self-retire. Stay evergreen or die, that’s Darwin's law for Document 3.0… But let's stop daydreaming.

 

More concretely and shorter term, this raises a few interesting questions how can all the associated document processing and storage infrastructure be provided in the cloud? Where will this document be physically stored, but also archived? In an era where all of our activities (and documents) need to be traceable and fully compliant with SOX and other stringent regulations, how do we put in place the infrastructure that will ensure that all of this activity is fully trackable and compliant?

 

Also, how do we ensure long-term preservation of those documents? A piece of paper (or papyrus) is universal and can survive for centuries; storing an electronic document in a single file, and a format that will still be readable in 20 years is a bit more adventurous; what about capturing that volatile Document 2.0 on the grid?

 

These are some of the topics I'd love to get input from some of the other conference participants...

4 Comments 0 References Permalink

A Document 2.0 world needs standards. In our past/current (Document 1.0) world, documents were mainly stored in their own proprietary formats. In Document 2.0, documents are increasingly stored in open, interchangeable formats to everyone's benefit. I am not claiming that Ismael's Document Sharing problems will disappear overnight, but the appearance of a few, and hopefully now a single XML-based standard for document sharing helps move us in the right direction.

 

This will greatly increase the Entreprise Adoption of Document 2.0 and Office 2.0 technologies. Since documents are increasingly distributed, collaborative, "mash-ups" of information stored in various locations, interoperability and interchange at a very granular level becomes vital.

 

But this evolution should continue. Being able to identify a table and an individual cell in a document is a definite need, which ODF can handle nicely, but what about extracting documents from unstructured documents such as resumes, letters or contracts? Over time, the document should become semantic capable of storing semantic information (or even re-creating that structure on the fly), besides structural and layout information.

13 Comments 0 References Permalink

Document 2.0?

Posted by Francois Ragnet Aug 12, 2008

Why should you care about the document?

 

First, I'd like to point out that the document is not only the traditional, old-fashioned sheet of paper. It is much more than that. It is a "representation of information designed with the capacity to communicate." It is not even limited by boundaries any more, or self-contained it becomes a "mash-up" of information, put together to convey specific information to other humans. This blog is a document.

 

Why are documents important in the Office 2.0? They are the lifeblood of the entreprise. Without documents, barely any business process can run. Documents flow through our organizations, are validated, reviewed, circulated, modified, transformed, printed, scanned. They are like the air we are breathing we don't notice them anymore, but without them, our business would stop.

 

Just like the Web, the Office, or the Enterprise, the document has to evolve to support more effective business processes. Welcome to Document 2.0! Open, secure, personalized, traceable, structured we'll explore a few of these traits in further posts.

9 Comments 0 References Permalink

Unlike many other bloggers, this will be my first participation to the Office 2.0 conference. I'm really looking forward to it! This blog will be about my anticipations, thoughts, and hopefully rich interactions before, during, and after the event.


I hope to bring my own "twist" to the Office 2.0 world the "Document" view. I'll be using some of the content and concepts I've been playing around on my blog, which basically talks about technologies that might change the way we work with documents in the office and explains why it is difficult to change decade-old practices. I'll test a few of those concepts, hoping to see how they relate and resonate with the Office 2.0 community...

7 Comments 0 References Permalink